Troy Clifton

Article Critque #1
Home
Final Project
Power Point
Class Bulletin Board
Article Critque #1
Article Critque #2
My Likes

Title of Journal

Article:   Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Women with Previous Gestational Diabetes

 

Title of Journal

Diabetes Care

 

Volume: 30                          Date: July 2007                 Page Number(s): S242(4)

 

·         What organization is responsible for publishing the journal you chose?

American Diabetes Association

 

 

·         What is your overall evaluation of this article?

 

_____Poor          ______Fair            ______Good        ___X____Very Good       _____Excellent

 

 

·         Why did you choose to review this particular article?

I chose to review this particular article because of its somewhat relativity to my research project.

 

 

 

·         How would you rate this article as a tool for teaching a student about cardiopulmonary physiology, radiography, or another allied health specialty? 

 

Students:               ____Poor       ____Fair       _____Good     __X_ Very Good      _____Excellent

 

Teachers:               ____Poor       ____Fair       __X_ Good     _____Very Good      _____Excellent

 

Patients:                 ____Poor       ____Fair       __X_ Good     _____Very Good      _____Excellent

 

·         Comment on the readability of this article. 

The readability of this article is semi-easy. They author does a good job of explaining everything he is talking about and does not leave much room for questioning in his article. He encompasses his topic very well. I felt like after reading this article that I learned information that I did not know beforehand.  

 

 

·         Course Topics covered: 1.

o    Using research (clinical trials) to answer a question

 

 

 

 

·         Brief Summary: My articles, “Prevention of Type 2 Diabetes in Women with Previous Gestational Diabetes” talk about just that. The article starts out using a historical facts and data to explain what Gestational Diabetes is and some of the studies that have taken place to be able to identify Gestational Diabetes. Then the article talks about the prevalence of diabetes after GDM (gestational diabetes mellitus). It explains how the medical field diagnoses GDM by looking at such things as carbohydrate intolerance and metabolic stress caused from being pregnant. Then the article looks at how we can determine whether or not the women will have Type 2 Diabetes after being diagnosed with GDM. Then the article gives current recommendations for postpartum follow-up and ends by explaining how three of the six clinical trials published about diabetes are directed specifically at women with a history of GDM. The author concludes with a brief summary of what the entire article was talking about.  

 

 

·         Identify and attempt to explain three (3) terms, procedures or concepts that were unfamiliar to you when reviewing this article.

1.)      GDM: gestational diabetes mellitus, was first discovered with Case 309 which happened in 1897 when a woman showed sugar during her pregnancy, but following confinement it disappeared then returned 9 years later as moderate to severe diabetes.

2.)      The procedure of measuring a woman fasting plasma glucose level to determine if she is falling into the early stages of gestational diabetes mellitus.

3.)      The concept that the American Diabetes Association recommends that women with GDM should be screened for diabetes 6 weeks postpartum and should be followed up with subsequent screening for the development of diabetes or pre-diabetes. Versus, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology makes no specific recommendation on follow-up other than to suggest that postpartum testing may be performed, despite the absence of data.  

 

 

 

·         Detail the strengths/weaknesses of this article.

 

Strengths

·         Very well written article

·         An abundance of references

·         Several good statistical data given

·          

 

 

 

Weakness

·         I could honestly not find any, the author uses statistics, references, and clinical trials to back up his article. He explained the history, the current, and what the medical field would like to have happen in the future. In all I think that it would be hard to say that this article had a weakness.

 

 

·         How might this article be useful to you in your further studies and career?

 

I do not necessarily think that this article will help me in my future studies but anyone that specializes in diabetes, works with diabetic patients, or for any doctor that deals with pregnant women’s health could definitely find this article to be of great help.

 

 

·         Does the article include a list of references/citations that can be used to find more information on the topics they cover?  Yes, the article has several references that could be used to find more information

 

 

Your Name: Troy Clifton                                                                                       Date: 2/20/2009